|
|
|
|
|
|
Missile Defense |
|
Integrate ballistic, cruise and air defense |
|
Develop a single battle management concept |
|
Declassify Cruise Missile Defense mission area |
|
Space Superiority |
|
Support Space Commission Report |
|
Fund EELV and follow-on access to space |
|
Accelerate R&D on Space Maneuver Vehicle,
Common Aerospace vehicle and micro-satellites |
|
Information Dominance |
|
Defense of networks needs significantly more
resources |
|
Major Information warfare policy issues need to
be worked |
|
Sensor integration and information management
require attention |
|
Intelligence |
|
Dramatically improve access to adversary secrets |
|
Combine intelligence And operational
communication links |
|
Share all sensors inputs with operational
commanders rapidly |
|
Forward Based & Deployed Forces provide
rapid response and access globally |
|
|
|
|
|
Focus transformation on Global Joint Response
Forces |
|
Ensure US forces have the capabilities to
operate across the full spectrum -- major conflict through peacetime
activities |
|
Significantly enhance operational capability by
building a true joint integrated force capability |
|
Organize, train and equip a standing joint
command and control system |
|
More frequent exercising and experimentation
with Joint forces |
|
Transform early entry forces (the Joint Response
Force Concept) as the first phase of eventual transformation of more of the
force -- |
|
Priority recipient of proven transformational
technologies and concepts |
|
Experimentation and actual use will determine
when and what to transform |
|
Build on forward deployed capability (stationed
and rotating deployments) |
|
Its “tip of the spear” capabilities permits
longer effective life for the legacy forces |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deployable Joint Command and Control system |
|
Tailorable force modules that train and exercise
together |
|
Robust connectivity |
|
horizontal and vertical within the force |
|
reach back to expertise and resources |
|
Pervasive networks of intelligence,
surveillance, reconnaissance and targeting assets |
|
enables shared situation understanding,
precision targeting and maneuver |
|
Long range precision strike and Information
Operations |
|
Forward deployed forces |
|
Rapidly deployable ground component of the joint
force |
|
inserted directly into the battlespace ready to
fight |
|
Deploy and sustain without buildup of vulnerable
logistic nodes and lines of communication |
|
Able to cope with WMD, missiles, mines, other
anti-access measures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Establish a means for independent input and
assessment of transformation |
|
Set up an internal, “skunk works” to form the
intellectual underpinning for transformation |
|
Set up a standing red team to aggressively
challenge transformation initiatives |
|
Assure that senior level, outside expertise is
made available |
|
Establish USJFCOM as an integral part of the
development and validation of future transformation visions and
initiatives. |
|
Mission and responsibilities should be focused
to concentrate on concept development, experimentation and training
activities in direct support to the overall DoD transformation vision |
|
Establish a SecDef Transformation Discretionary
Fund |
|
Flexibility to quickly fund transformation
initiatives of extraordinary potential. |
|
Funded on an annual basis on the order of $500M |
|
Establish a periodic SecDef Transformation
Review Process |
|
Reassess and refine overall transformation goals
and initiatives |
|
Major input to the PPBBS and long range planning
process |
|
Responsibility for the review’s conduct should
reside in the Joint Staff. |
|
Establish an educational initiative to engrain
transformational thought processes throughout the professional military and
civilian career development paths. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integration and synergy that true Jointness
brings is the most powerful transformation concept |
|
Joint Command and Control is the most enabling
transformation program |
|
Focus Transformation on new capabilities for
Joint Response Forces |
|
Initiate new programs identified as essential in
transformation |
|
Review and accept acceleration of black programs
identified |
|
Missile defense, space dominance, information
dominance and intelligence are also essential transformation areas |
|
Institutionalize the transformation process in
the DOD |
|
|
|
|
|
Charter |
|
The Study Group will identify |
|
Capabilities needed by US forces to effectively
address the 21st century security environment |
|
Capabilities needed to meet national
intelligence and space defense needs |
|
Transformation recommendations – how to develop
and field the desired capabilities |
|
Opportunities for cost savings, where feasible |
|
The
Study Group will complete its work and brief the Secretary by 30 April,
2001 |
|
|
|
Approach |
|
Focus on Conventional Forces |
|
Identify key capabilities |
|
Select key transformation areas to explore |
|
Take briefings, conduct individual research |
|
Develop transformation priorities and gain group
consensus |
|
Build final report briefing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Develop and mature the technology needed to
enable mid-long term continuous transformation |
|
|
|
Major thrusts |
|
Information and Decision Superiority |
|
Decision Support Tools |
|
Navigation and timing |
|
New sensors across electronic spectrum |
|
Laser communications |
|
Advanced ELINT |
|
Information Warfare - offensive & defensive |
|
Need strong secure complex of labs and R&D
efforts |
|
Need means to connect labs and offense &
defense |
|
Need IW/IO career path |
|
Advanced Power |
|
Energy storage (e.g. advanced batteries,
micro-fuel cells) |
|
Electrical generator and handling (e.g. Fuel
cells, micro-turbines) |
|
Directed energy |
|
Continue advancement in high energy beam
propagation & control |
|
Push maturation of solid state devices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stealth & counter stealth |
|
Maintain sustained investment in stealth for
next generation of bomber, fighter, weapons (to include unmanned) |
|
Maintain our current edge to counter adversary
stealth |
|
Robotics |
|
Need for spiral development air, land, sea,
undersea |
|
Need for experimentation & development of
doctrine |
|
Need to leverage and share results (e.g. Air --
Land) |
|
Non-lethal capabilities |
|
Provide spectrum of options for dissuasion,
influence and control |
|
Need means for experimentation |
|
CW/BW |
|
Need sustained program for detection and
characterization |
|
Active and passive protection |
|
Leverage dual-use technology from commercial
bio-tech industry |
|
|
|
|
|
Achieving Information and Decision Superiority |
|
Command and Control |
|
Information and Communications |
|
Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance |
|
Information Operations |
|
Striking with Precision |
|
Long Range Precision Attack |
|
Time Critical Precision Targeting |
|
Supporting Forces |
|
Direct Force Insertion |
|
Deploying and Sustaining Military Power Rapidly |
|
Command and Control |
|
Deploying |
|
Focused Logistics |
|
Forward Basing and Infrastructure |
|
Dominating Land, Sea, Air and Space Battlespace |
|
Command and Control |
|
Maneuver and Mobility |
|
Intelligence |
|
Fires and Precision Attack |
|
Logistics |
|
Protection |
|
Nuclear Chemical and Biological Defenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of the Capability |
|
To a much greater extent than today, be able to
conduct operations that: |
|
Operate inside the adversary’s decision cycles |
|
Combine both precision and speed (controlling
the tempo) |
|
Can respond rapidly and potently to the full
range of contingencies |
|
Are parallel, continuous and seamless rather
than sequential, scheduled and segmented |
|
Match tactical actions to strategic and
operational ends (effects-based operations) |
|
Move from multi-service operations that merely
deconflict services’ jobs to joint operations that exploit the potential
for synergy of true teams (whole greater than sum of the parts) |
|
|
|
Critical Elements |
|
Command and Control |
|
Information and Communications |
|
Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance |
|
Information Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key
Operational Capabilities |
|
A
cohesive, always available, joint
Command and Control system (people, networks and decision tools) able to
conduct rapid and decisive operations with distributed joint forces across
the full spectrum of contingencies |
|
Enabling Capabilities |
|
Joint Task Force headquarters (vice
Service-centric) |
|
Cohesive standing teams (vice pick-up) |
|
Small, mobile, employing reach-back,
collaborative tools |
|
Flatter, adaptive structure |
|
Standards of readiness, response and performance
(expect and enforce these standards as we do for weapon systems and other
force elements) |
|
Integrated planning, execution, assessment (vice
sequential and separate) |
|
Family of decision support tools |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key Transformation Programs |
|
“A” |
|
Develop Joint Command and Control as a core
competence |
|
Provide JFCOM the resources and authority
(working with other CINCs) to design, organize and equip prototype lean,
distributed and adaptive Command and Control system and associated joint
headquarters |
|
Establish more frequent, tailored training and
exercise cycles to provide the necessary levels of readiness and cohesion
for those forces that may be part of the Joint Response Force |
|
Establish a major cooperative JFCOM/DARPA
program to develop new joint command and control systems and headquarters |
|
Co-evolve new Command and Control concepts,
doctrine, organizations, leader development and training with technology
and materiel |
|
Involve interagency and coalition partners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key Transformation Programs (Continued) |
|
“A” |
|
Develop Joint Command and Control as a core
competence (2) |
|
Establish and enforce standards of performance,
readiness, response |
|
Treat joint Command and Control (and associated
networks) as we do combat systems |
|
Establish lean standing, deployable joint
headquarters for rapid joint force response at the regional CINCs |
|
Evolve capabilities from JFCOM and theater
experiments and exercises |
|
Implement Family of Interoperable Operating
Pictures (FIOP) and other collaborative tools for planning, execution and
assessment |
|
Multi-level, user tailored |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of the Capability |
|
Forces that Deter, Assure, Dissuade with
capability to: |
|
Rapidly respond globally with U.S. based long
range forces to lead or support deployed forces to strike many critical
targets nearly simultaneously |
|
Integrate with forward operating forces as a
single integrated force package |
|
Plan operations enroute to reduce response time |
|
Responsiveness improved by various alert
postures that also demonstrate U.S. resolve. |
|
Directly insert ground forces to control centers
of gravity |
|
Critical Elements |
|
Long Range Precision Attack |
|
Time Critical Precision Targeting |
|
Supporting Forces |
|
Direct Force Insertion |
|
|
|
|
Key Operational Capabilities |
|
Offset the adversary’s key access denial
strategies |
|
Execute operational strikes from relative
sanctuaries |
|
Penetrate defended air space and disable or
destroy defenses |
|
Gain control of key airfields, seaports, and
infrastructure |
|
Defend deployed forces |
|
|
|
Enabling Capabilities |
|
ISR assets that can locate key adversary’s
defenses and nodes |
|
Stealth aircraft with precision munitions |
|
Cruise missiles with precision strike capability |
|
Escort aircraft for force protection |
|
Direct Insertion Forces with standoff protection |
|
|
|
|
Key Transformation Programs |
|
“A” |
|
Convert four Ohio SSBNs to SSGNs with maximum
number of cruise missiles |
|
Enhance the B-2A force with large carriage
capacity and flexible targeting capability |
|
Produce the Small Diameter Bomb |
|
Convert ALCMs to CALCMs; Increase B-52
conventional force for carriage |
|
Accelerate an improved Global Hawk deployment |
|
Develop stealthy Joint Long Range Cruise Missile |
|
Develop a new long range precision strike
capability |
|
Accelerate Navy JSF fielding |
|
|
|
|
Key Operational Capabilities |
|
Gain situational awareness |
|
Find Fix and Track fixed, mobile and moving
targets |
|
Target and engage with precision target location |
|
Command and control within short timelines |
|
Assess success and re-attack quickly |
|
|
|
Enabling Capabilities |
|
Space and Airborne ISR platforms discussed in
previous section |
|
Direct target insertion into platform and weapon |
|
Inflight or reachback planning capabilities |
|
|
|
Key Transformation Programs |
|
Joint Command and Control program initiative |
|
ISR and Communications programs described in
previous section |
|
Planning and execution and assessment tools |
|
Inflight corrections to precision weapons after
release |
|